Prediction of Jaimee Fourlis [319th] vs Mirjam Bjorklund [551st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L W W W L W
Form
L L W L L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Fourlis 1 - 1 Bjorklund
They have played 4 sets in total, with Fourlis winning 2 and Bjorklund winning 2. The last match between Fourlis and Bjorklund was at the W100 Oeiras, 23-04-2024, Q3, Clay with Mirjam Bjorklund getting the victory 6-0 3-1 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jaimee Fourlis | 1 |
| Mirjam Bjorklund | 1 |
| Fourlis | Stats | Bjorklund |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (4-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (2-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 319 | Ranking | 551 |
| 147 | Highest Rank | 123 |
| 25 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 10 |
| 57% (232-172) | Career Total W/L | 60% (219-146) |
| $275,258 | Career Prize Money | $508,748 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 3-1 ret. |
Stats 
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
||||
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 14 | Games Won | 15 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:24:30 | Average Match Time | 1:24:30 |
| 69% (72/104) | 1st Serve % | 55% (52/95) |
| 49% (35/72) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (28/52) |
| 50% (16/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (21/43) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (7/16) |
| 48% (46/95) | Return Points Win % | 51% (53/104) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jaimee Fourlis vs Mirjam Bjorklund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fourlis 1 - 1 Bjorklund
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fourlis has won 38.61% of points on their second serve, while Bjorklund has won 38.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fourlis, in recent form, has won 53.85% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bjorklund has won 52.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.45% and 34.91% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fourlis has saved 48.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bjorklund has saved 41.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fourlis has won 60% of matches played (W/L 33/ 22), with Bjorklund winning 36.84% (W/L 7/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fourlis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 17/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Bjorklund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 128/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Fourlis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.26% of matches (W/L 33/ 20), where as Bjorklund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 4/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fourlis winning 1 times and Bjorklund being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Fourlis winning 2 and Bjorklund winning 2. The last match between Fourlis and Bjorklund was at the W100 Oeiras, 23-04-2024, Q3, Clay with Mirjam Bjorklund getting the victory 6-0 3-1 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fourlis and Bjorklund have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fourlis winning 0 times and Bjorklund 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fourlis winning 0, and Bjorklund 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fourlis has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.27 while Bjorklund has played against players with an average rank of 181.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fourlis has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bjorklund has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fourlis has converted 45.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bjorklund has converted 45.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jaimee Fourlis vs Mirjam Bjorklund Best Odds For The Match
Jaimee Fourlis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Sarah Rokusek
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
105)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
53%
(
46 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
92
Total Points Won
100
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Lizette Cabrera
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Yufei Ren
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
89%
(
8 of
9)
49%
(
51 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
79%
(
99 of
126)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
44%
(
56 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
115
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hiromi Abe
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
36 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Shiho Akita
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
77%
(
57 of
74)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mirjam Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
30%
(
13 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Olivia Gadecki
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
50 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Alycia Parks
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
12 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Anastasiia Sobolieva
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Fourlis vs Bjorklund?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Fourlis Vs Bjorklund is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (232/172) | Win/Loss | 60% (219/146) |
| 56% (528/414) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (487/339) |
| 53% (4535/4071) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4027/3382) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 459 | Aces Total | 538 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 927 | Total Double Faults | 596 |
| 1:42:48 | Average Match Time | 1:28:15 |
| 273 | Average Opponent Rank | 232.13 |
| 69% (18046/26037) | 1st Serve % | 65% (14263/21857) |
| 60% (10755/18046) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (8662/14263) |
| 46% (3673/7990) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3562/7594) |
| 48% (1644/3456) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1460/3080) |
| 47% (12412/26606) | Return Points Win % | 47% (10573/22321) |
| 57% (226/398) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (215/355) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 63% (45/71) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (34/64) |
| 50% (70/140) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (51/102) |
| 86% (224/192) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (223/195) |
| 14% (224/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (223/27) |
| 22% (180/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (142/23) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
